Today, speaking about sub clocks means pointing straight to a category of timepieces that is normally used for even ten per cent of its possible.
What good is it to possess the best, which for him to dive to over 1,000 meters of depth would be as easy as "drinking a glass of water", when the individual has fastened his wrist to the max following a dip and a couple of strokes, then return instantly to lounge under the umbrella?
If this is their principal use it is merely the fault of old habits at least as far as the debut of the so-called divers of the modern age that dates back to the middle of the previous century.
The incorrigible need to be the protagonist of the best diving watches
Three years later, in 1953, Blancpain invented the Fifty Fathoms, among the most iconic timepieces that the category can boast, has been tied to Jacques-Yves Cousteau's wrist to challenge the depths of their well-identified abysses at "The Silent World", a famous documentary -film additionally winner of an Oscar award.
Continuing, I believe that non-fans will remember well among the first Rolex Submariner appear several times with Sean Connery, Agent 007 in the movie Goldfinger shot of 1964. Tied into his wrist thanks to his fabric strap turned into a legend. It was a mythical reference 6538 no-guard, to understand each other with no crown protector shoulders, imitated a little by everybody.
These are only two of the very first cases that reveal how - fiction or fact - for more than fifty years the press - driven by the watch sector - decided the diver watches ought to be the first to personify the concept of man-adventure. Maybe it's also from that day the manufacturers when it came to describing their versions started to use the phrase: "appropriate for any event".
The 007 change, sadly also the mythical "Mr. Q "- the inventor of all of the mechanisms of the most well-known secret agent in the world, and clearly also the watch whose role was played with the Omega Seamaster for many decades.
But beyond their real use in this massive family whose origins would only deal with "hard even more than steel", now there are also versions so bejeweled to dread even once you have to wash the palms.
But a true diver's view has generally always here had a lot to say technically talking. Let's just mention the features and constructive characteristics of these fascinating references.
I've a long-standing friend who's an expert diver and who, throughout his diving at the read morewebsite Persian Gulf, makes 100% of his diving watch - like that valve for the escape of gaseous mixtures which are breathed at large depths.
A real wrist sub Has to Be able to guarantee the following performances:
Fantastic visibility during the dip
A protection against magnetic fields superior to the norm
Resistance to impact and salt water
Accurate confirmation of the performance of the device that reports the dive time
An in-depth evaluation of the efficiency of its motion, either mechanical or quartz
But the tests didn't end here: today professional diving watches need to adhere to specific rules like the ones described by ISO 6425.
For a common mortal usage, what we know is the best, the best sub could be ultimately a watchable to offer attributes much milder and easier to handle.
I recall that in order to simply immerse the surface in maximum safety, a timepiece ought to be certified to withstand a pressure of at least 5 ATM (approximately 50 meters), which seems to be redundant, but this isn't so when it is done a trivial swim in the sea. It'd be better to avoid diving, particularly if ours could not even count to a screw-on crown, better still when protected on the sides from the classic two shoulders.
And the security on the watertight status of the submerged timepieces?
Precisely for people who would never use them for specialist purposes the ideal would be to have the ability to rely on a system that visually signals on the dial in the event the crown is not completely screwed, as well as the watch is consequently in a clear state of non-security.
Sadly, this is the principal reason why even an abyssal super dip watch might need to be rushed to a service center, prior to seawater entering risks compromising any mechanism indefinitely. This function already exists, but on hardly any models, which honestly I do not understand why.
You might have worn your diving diver's watch in your wrist in order to visit the sea and as a result, after correcting the time, have left to twist the crown tightly. It's by far the most frequent case.
Suggestion - As soon as you've worn the costume decide on the fly : leave your diver somewhere safe or obligatorily make a closing but basic check on the tightening of the winding crown.
Now that we've seen together a little 'of problems linked to the time that must satisfy the water, and also given the necessary information, I show you that - at least so far - are for me the best dive watches.
They are not many: I've divided them into two classes. The order in which they appear doesn't represent any position.